But if the reform of the property tax has some meaningful sense, that is another innovation, the ne

Here we solemnly promised that next year will not increase taxes. And like so: we talk about the introduction of a sales tax, VAT increase - and then fell silent. But, it appears, on the sly, creeping manner still ready to increase fees collected both with people and with business.
First, the substantially - at times - to raise taxes on property (apartments, houses, land). The relevant law has already been signed by the President. There will be a transition from the establishment of the size of this tax in accordance with these legendary BTI to the cadastral (market) valuation. The point is basically correct, because to appear really objective grounds for establishing the amount of this payment. But that's what worries: the people (or rather, it is whether the 86, or 84 per cent), carried away by patriotic sentiments, does not know that next year someone will appreciate it in a different apartment, and then will come a receipt to pay with very different numbers than a year ago.
However, ouval rsch for the sake of fairness it must be said that the increase in the property tax is at times an additive, usually only a few hundred rubles, and even less. For most people this will not be a painful blow to the family budget. But the combination of high inflation (and it is next year, seems to be such), so - reducing the purchasing power of many, with an increase ouval rsch in tax on our ubogonkie apartments and garden can greatly spoil the mood of the masses. If the reform of the property tax (the need for which, incidentally, has been discussed for many years) produced in 2006-2007., ouval rsch When the real incomes of the population grew well, the optimistic expectations of the public that does not blurry like. And now it looks new and, unfortunately, a steady trend: the state is not coping with their professional duties, begins to compensate the shortcomings of the citizens' wallets.
But if the reform of the property tax has some meaningful sense, that is another innovation, the need to introduce that Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev at the Investment Forum "Sochi-2014" is a pure rip-off, the implementation of which will cause direct damage to the already frail Russian economy. It is about establishing a special fees to local governments for the right to trade, ouval rsch provide catering services and taxis, as well as the introduction of tourist tax.
Whether the participants realized investment forum, what is it? Explain: small business, which is already on its last legs we breathe, will impose additional tribute. This will lead to higher prices in the shops and cafes in a taxi - at least from the fact that the owners have proposed to increase their costs lay in the price of goods and services. However, many of them simply rolled their activities ouval rsch - which, incidentally, also lead to a rise in prices due to the increasing monopolization. I was particularly touched by the proposal to introduce the tourist tax in an environment where the industry is going through a severe crisis. This measure will scare away from travel agencies more clients. Is it not clear to Dmitry Anatolyevich and those who offer it is ready?
But that's not all. The third innovation that awaits only its legislative registration - is increasing payments to the Fund of obligatory medical insurance. Who is the employer deducts only to 5.1% of the annual salary 624 thous. Rubles. Anything over this bar, delivery is not taxable. From next year, this strap is canceled, ie, You have to pay any salaries. It would seem a good thing. After all, our medicine, despite the increase in government infusions, still heavily underfunded. ouval rsch But there are questions.
Why is our government scrapes bottom of the barrel, to replenish the Fund of obligatory medical insurance, instead of a little saving - for example, on defense spending, which in 2013 amounted to 2.1 trillion rubles, and this year will approach $ 3 trillion? It is more than that would have blocked the additive, which is expected to spread from the mandatory payment for all wage - about 200 billion rubles.
To answer ouval rsch this question, we ask: why a significant portion of the 200 billion rubles will be as officially stated, no mandatory health insurance fund, and will be taken to the federal budget? That is what happens: under the guise of improving the financing of medicine carried a requisition money employers to maintain the pants of our state. So the answer is clear: the budget situation in Russia is very bad. And to the extent that I had to go for a direct violation of the principles of legislative registration of social insurance. Article 16 of the Law "On the basis of compulsory social insurance" is set